If India has already abolished a 157-year-old law outlawing consensual sex between gay men, it鈥檚 about time that Singapore does the same for its own too. The highly divisive issue about doing away with Section 377A of the Penal Code has been propelled into national discussion once again, with renewed calls for reform.
As of writing, a petition calling for the review of the Singapore Penal Code has . Authored by Singaporean filmmaker Glen Goei and Eugene Thuraisingam LLP practice trainee Johannes Hadi, the petition is also being lead by prominent local figures such as former Nominated Member of Parliament聽Calvin Cheng, founder of property market site 99.co Darius Cheung and actress Janice Koh. Organizations such as Pink Dot SG, The Bear Project, Action for AIDS, Oogachaga and many more LGBTQ networks have put their weight behind it.
The petition itself urges the Singapore government to include Section 377A in its first major review of the Penal Code in more than a decade.
鈥淭he proposed changes to the Penal Code are expected to be tabled in Parliament in November this year. Unfortunately, an executive decision by the government was taken to exclude Section 377A from the scope of the review,鈥 noted the petition鈥檚 authors.
The petition and its supporting signatures will be sent to the Penal Code Review Committee as well as local Members of Parliament by Sept 24.
鈥楶lease Keep Penal Code 377A in Singapore鈥
On the other end of the spectrum, there鈥檚 an that calls for the retention of Section 377A in Singapore.
鈥淏y repealing the section 377A penal code, it would begin to normalize homosexual behaviors as a societal norm and lead to greater push for other LGBT rights in our conservative society as we have seen played out in other western societies today,鈥 wrote the petition鈥檚 author, a user who goes by the name Paul P.
鈥淲e do not think the vocal minority should impose their values and practice on the silent majority who are still largely conservative.鈥
The petition has so far gathered over 83,000 signatures, a far greater volume than the petition that wants the law abolished. It also hosts a bevy of… colorful comments.
Section 377A
The Singapore government鈥檚 stance on Section 377A unchanged, even after India removed it.
Last week, India decriminalized part of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code聽that outlaws consensual gay sex. The archaic law prohibited consensual 鈥渃arnal intercourse against the order of nature鈥, a rule that was enacted during the nation鈥檚 British colonial days.
Singapore, on the other hand, still upholds section 377A of its own Penal Code, which criminalizes acts of 鈥済ross indecency鈥 between two men. Similar to India, the law dates back to British colonial rule, and while sex between men remains a criminal act here, the statute is not being actively enforced.
Even so, the LGBTQ community views the existence of section 377A as one that basically labels them as unconvicted criminals. This on top of the fact that a number of examples from the past couple of years indicate that the government refuses LGBTQ voices and culture to permeate the mainstream in Singapore. Relationships between same-sex couples are also not officially recognized in the city-state, while there are no laws that protect LGBT Singaporeans from discrimination in the workplace, housing or other areas.
